Biased Umpiring Costs Pakistan as Experts Call Out ICC for Handing Over Match to India….????

Biased Umpiring Costs Pakistan as Experts Call Out ICC for Handing Over Match to India

 

 

 

Pakistan and India played out an all-time T20 World Cup classic at the Melbourne Cricket Ground as India emerged victorious on the last ball of the match.

 

ALSO READ

While star Indian batter, Virat Kohli, played one of the best innings of T20 history, there were some questionable decisions at important junctures of the game that turned the tide in the Men in Blue’s favor.

The final over of the game was filled with drama as Mohammad Nawaz was tasked to defend 16 runs in the final over. Kohli and Pandya, who had played remarkably well to rescue India from a precarious position, were confident of chasing the total down but Nawaz had other ideas as he dismissed Pandya on the first ball of the over.

The match turned in India’s favor on the fourth ball of the over as Kohli smashed Nawaz for a six. To the surprise of the cricketing world, the ball was adjudged a no-ball for a full toss above waist height by leg umpire, Marais Erasmus. The questionable decision irked the Pakistani captain as he urged the umpire to confirm the call from the third umpire but all of Babar’s efforts went in vain.

To add insult to injury, another questionable decision went against Pakistan as Kohli, after being bowled by Nawaz on the fifth ball (free hit), ran three runs as the ball deflected off the stumps and went to the third-man position.

As per the International Cricket Council (ICC) rule book, the ball is deemed dead once it hits the stumps. However, there is no clear statement in the rule book if the ball hits the stumps on a free hit. Nevertheless, the decision by the on-field umpires in a game of such magnitude should have been confirmed by the match referee, Ranjan Madugalle, before the final decision was made on the delivery.

 

ALSO READ

The decisions changed the course of the game as India chased down the target of 160 runs with 4 wickets in hand. The questionable decision caused an uproar on social media as fans were disappointed with the bad officiating in the game.

Former Australian cricketer, Brad Hogg, also took to social media to voice his opinion on the matter.

 

 


T20 WC Live Score, complete 2022 T20 WC Schedule, and latest 2022 T20 World Cup Stats here!

 

Biased Umpiring Costs Pakistan as Experts Call Out ICC for Handing Over Match to India

In a highly charged cricket encounter between Pakistan and India, what was anticipated to be a thrilling contest has sparked significant controversy surrounding umpiring decisions that have raised eyebrows among experts and fans alike. The match, which concluded with India emerging victorious, has led to widespread allegations of biased officiating, prompting calls for the International Cricket Council (ICC) to address these concerns.

Critics point to several contentious decisions that appeared to favor the Indian side, including a number of questionable lbw calls and overlooked appeals that could have altered the course of the match. Such discrepancies not only undermine the integrity of the sport but also cast a pall over Pakistan’s efforts on the field.

Former cricketers and analysts have been vocal in their condemnation of the umpiring, suggesting that these decisions were not merely errors but indications of a systemic bias. The prevailing sentiment is that the ICC must take immediate action to ensure that officiating standards are upheld and that all teams are afforded a fair chance in crucial matches, especially those with high stakes and historical significance.

As the cricketing community grapples with the implications of this match, it is clear that the integrity of the game remains paramount. The ICC’s response to these allegations will be closely monitored, as it has the potential to restore faith in the fairness of international cricket. In the meantime, Pakistan will have to regroup and focus on the road ahead, while the cricketing world calls for accountability and transparency from the governing body.

Leave a Comment